even one founder for each factor. It has not always been a comfortable living
arrangement, but when the battling has been the fiercest, the school has
been at its most alert. The Institute will doubtless change in many ways as
differences between theory and fact continue to lessen, and there are many
persons who face the prospect with dismay. Let them be different, they
say--like male and female--but let them learn how to live together more
happily.
Worcester Tech has maintained an unusual relationship with the
community in which it lives, its first building created from one of Worcester's
own granite ribs. It was the mechanic, the lawyer, the minister, and the
manufacturer who lived around the corner who built the school and brought
it up as their own. Alternately they have ignored and interfered, praised and
criticized, protected and betrayed. But it is their own. For many years before
the building of dormitories, Worcester homes were the homes of the
students. And ever since, no matter where the students and teachers have
come from or with what background, they have been welcomed as members
of the Worcester family.
The school has reciprocated. There has never been a time when the
professors have not been willing to lend a hand in municipal planning, when
the doors of the Institute have not been open to its neighbors. First there
were courses in drawing, long before the subject was taught in public
schools. For many summers young boys, eight to thirteen years old, were
taught woodworking in the Shops. Then there were public lectures, courses
for mechanics, and Civil Defense instruction. Now there are seminars,
colloquiums, Scientific Briefings for Tomorrow, the School of Industrial
Management, and the Evening Graduate School. With students coming from
sixteen foreign countries, with staff participation in teacher-refresher
programs sponsored by the National Science Foundation, and with the
adoption of a missionary interest in a sister Institute--the Scree Mullapudi in
India--W.P.I. often finds itself in the neighborhood of a wider world. But the
sense of proprietorship has not changed.
For these factors of uniqueness--the constant inquiry into identity, the
contact with the work-a-day world, the reconciliation of the practical with the
scientific, the community sense of belonging --there has been a price. There
have been contributions of time and funds and effort far beyond the
accounting. Nerves have been rubbed raw with abrasive argument, careers
have sometimes been mistakenly shattered. There has been an astonishing
number of persons willing to be hurt in order to keep faith with self and
society, and the integrity thus given to the Institute is its proudest claim to
distinction.
Today the Institute stands solidly atop its rounded hill, still overlooking
the City and reaching toward the sky. It stands there for more than any other
reason because--by some strange and wonderful supply--there have
always been enough people who cared.