Document Type masters report Author Name LIU, DAYANG Email Address dayangliu at gmail.com URN etd-010909-121301 Title A Review of Causal Inference Degree MS Department Mathematical Sciences Advisors Joseph D. Petruccelli, Advisor Bogdan M. Vernescu, Department Head Keywords Counterfactual Noncounterfactual Date of Presentation/Defense 2008-12-15 Availability unrestricted
In this report, I first review the evolution of ideas of causation as it relates to causal inference. Then I introduce two currently competing perspectives on this issue: the counterfactual perspective and the noncounterfactual perspective. The ideas of two statisticians, Donald B. Rubin, representing the counterfactual perspective, and A.P.Dawid, representing the noncounterfactual perspective are examined in detail and compared with the evolution of ideas of causality. The main difference between these two perspectives is that the counterfactual perspective is based on counterfactuals which cannot be observed even in principle but the noncounterfactual perspective only relies on observables. I describe the definition of causes and causal inference methods under both perspectives, and I illustrate the application of the two types of methods by specific examples. Finally, I explore various controversies on these two perspectives.
Browse by Author | Browse by Department | Search all available ETDs
Questions? Email email@example.com