Appendix J: Electronic Absorption Spectroscopy of Metal Complexes
Electronic Structure of d-Metal Complexes. One of the most fascinating aspects of transition metal complexes is the remarkable spectrum of colors which they exhibit. The colors are a result of several features of the complexes which are explicable in reasonably simple terms.
Consider a typical first-transition series metal, e.g., chromium. Free, gaseous chromium atoms have the electronic configuration 1s22s22p63s23p64s13d5, or [Ar]4s13d5. Removal of 3 electrons from this atom (remember that 4s electrons come off first, followed by 3d) gives the CrIII ion with configuration [Ar]3d3. Recall that there are five 3d orbitals, each of which can accommodate a maximum of two electrons (one with "up" spin, one with "down" spin). Since for CrIII there are only three electrons to occupy a total of 10 spots, we say that CrIII has "partially filled" d orbitals (the same can be said of a Cr atom). This characteristic is the hallmark of transition metals and their ions and is the primary reason for the colors exhibited by their complexes.
Many transition metal complexes are octahedral, meaning that the metal ion is surrounded by 6 ligands at the vertices of a regular octahedron. We are going to consider what happens to a transition metal ion in this type of environment. For the sake of simplicity, we will consider the ligands to be capable of sigma bonding only--that is, they each have one orbital which contains a pair of electrons and which can overlap along the internuclear axis with a suitable metal orbital. The resulting complex can be pictured as in Figure 1, where we have introduced a right-handed Cartesian coordinate system in such a way that the ligands lie along the axes, and we have shown the ligand donor orbitals (e.g., if the ligands were NH3 molecules, these orbitals would by sp3 hybrids) pointing in toward the metal, as they must if effective overlap between ligand and metal orbitals is to occur.
How will metal and ligand orbitals interact to form molecular orbitals (MOs) for the complex, and which metal orbitals will be involved in these MOs?
To answer this question we must decide which of the metal ion valence orbitals have appropriate shapes and orientations for overlap with the ligand donor orbitals. Consider first the 4s orbital of the metal. Can it overlap in sigma fashion with any of the ligand orbitals? Since the 4s orbital has equal probability density along each of the 6 Cartesian directions, we conclude that, yes, it can overlap with all of the ligand orbitals in s fashion, as shown in Figure 2.
Similarly we conclude that the 4px orbital can overlap in s fashion with both ligand orbitals which lie along the x axis (but not with ligand orbitals along y or z, since the 4px orbital has no probability density along either of these axes); the 4py orbital can overlap with both ligand orbitals along the y axis; and the 4pz orbital can overlap with both ligand orbitals along the z axis. The picture drawn in Figure 3 represents any one of the three axes:
There is one more point to be made here. You will recall that one lobe of a p orbital has positive sign, while the other lobe has negative sign. Two orbitals which are to overlap effectively must have the same sign, so the ligand orbital which is to overlap with the negative lobe of the p orbital must be negative, as shown above. This will not concern us any more at this point.
So far we have decided that the 4s and the three 4p orbitals of the
metal are all suitable for s
bonding with the ligands. However, there are
six ligands and thus far we have only 4 metal orbitals to use in bonding
them. We need a total of 6 metal orbitals to s
bond to 6 ligands. We
must therefore decide whether any of the 3d orbitals are located suitably
for bonding. Let's consider first the 3dz2 orbital, which has positive
lobes along the +z and -z directions, and a negative doughnut of
probability density in the x-y plane, as shown in Figure 4.
The ligand orbitals lying along the z axis can obviously overlap in å fashion with the two positive lobes; and the ligand orbitals approaching along the x and y axes can overlap in å style with the negative doughnut (if we change their signs). We therefore conclude that the 3dz2 orbital can engage in s bonding. Similar conclusions are reached for the 3dx2-y2 orbital, which has positive lobes along +x and -x and negative lobes along +y and -y.
We now have found 6 metal orbitals which are capable of s bonding to the 6 ligands. But we still have not considered any of the three remaining d orbitals--dxy, dyz, dxz. We will consider one of them. Arguments for the other two are identical. Let's consider dxz, which lies in the x-z plane as shown in Figure 6.
Consider the ligand s orbital which is approaching along the +x axis. Can it overlap in s fashion with dxz? The answer is no. The ligand orbital will overlap with the upper right positive lobe of dxz, but this overlap will be exactly cancelled by an equal and opposite overlap with the lower right negative lobe of dxz. The net overlap is precisely zero. This is equivalent to saying that the dxz orbital has a node along the x axis.
Similar arguments show that none of the four ligands in the xz plane have net overlap with dxz. dyz and dxy fail to overlap with ligand s orbitals for exactly the same reasons. These three orbitals are thus non-bonding in a sigma sense. We conclude that of the originally degenerate (same energy) five 3d orbitals, two are suitable for sigma bonding with ligands and three are not. The d orbitals can therefore be categorized into two groups with respect to their behavior toward s -bonding ligands. Are these two groups still of the same energy?
It must be assumed that if two orbitals, even if intrinsically similar, are differently oriented toward their surroundings, there will be some difference in the energy of an electron depending upon which of them it occupies. Let us see precisely why this difference arises. When each of two atoms has an orbital directed toward the other one (say s 1 and s 2 of Figure 7 below), and these atoms approach closely enough for these orbitals to overlap, the orbitals become "mixed" to form new orbitals, one (the "bonding molecular orbital" or "bonding MO") having relatively high probability density between the two nuclei, and the other (the "antibonding molecular orbital" or "antibonding MO") having relatively low probability density between nuclei. When electrons occupy the bonding orbital, the atoms become bound together, while when electrons occupy the antibonding orbital, a repulsive or antibonding force is set up. Two general statements can be made regarding the two molecular orbitals: 1. the bonding MO always has an energy lower than that of either atomic (or hybrid) orbital from which it is formed, and the antibonding MO always has an energy higher than that of either constituent atomic orbital; 2. If the two
atomic orbitals with which we begin have rather different energies, the resulting bonding MO will have predominantly the characteristics of the lower energy atomic orbital, while the resulting antibonding MO will have predominantly the characteristics of the higher energy atomic orbital. These two statements are illustrated on an energy level diagram below.
Finally, we should state that if two atomic or hybrid orbitals are of such a nature that they have no overlap (such as dxz and the ligand s orbital in Figure 6), there is no mixing and no formation of bonding and antibonding orbitals. The two orbitals are said to be non-bonding with respect to each other.
All of the above considerations apply not only to diatomic molecules, but also to the case of a metal ion interacting in å fashion with six ligands at the apices of an octahedron. Each metal-ligand interaction will give rise to one s bonding and one s antibonding MO. Considering only the interaction between the metal d orbitals and the ligand orbitals, the following energy level diagram results:
The dz2 and dx2-y2 orbitals, which we decided are capable of sigma bonding with the ligands, do so, thus generating two bonding and two antibonding MOs. However, since the metal d orbitals are higher in energy than the ligand sigma orbitals, the antibonding MOs, s *, will have predominantly the character of the metal dz2 and dx2-y2 orbitals, according to general statement 2 above. The dxy,xz,yz metal orbitals, labelled n, which are impervious to s bonding and are therefore non-bonding, are largely unaffected by bond formation and retain their original energies. So instead of maintaining their original five-fold degeneracy in the complex, the d orbitals are split up into a doubly degenerate set, s *, of higher energy and a triply degenerate set, n, of lower energy. This splitting is labelled and is called the ligand field splitting (LFS) since it arises from the "field" generated by the ligands. Now, each ligand s orbital is originally occupied by a pair of electrons. When the complex is formed, these electron pairs will occupy the molecular orbitals of lowest possible energy--that is, the s bonding MOs. Occupation of the ligand s orbitals and the s bonding MOs has been indicated in Figure 10, where represents an electron pair, one electron with up spin and one with down spin. But how about the d electrons originally possessed by the metal ion--which orbitals will they occupy in the complex? Since the degeneracy of the set of d orbitals has been split, electrons no longer will occupy all members of the set with equal probability. Instead, they tend to occupy the more stable ones preferentially, subject to restrictions arising from the Pauli Exclusion Principle and from interelectronic repulsion. (This is taken up more fully in the chapter dealing with magnetism). The electrons will therefore tend to occupy the triply degenerate non-bonding set first.
Let's return to our original example, CrIII. In the complex Cr(NH3)6+3, the chromium d orbitals will be split as above. The three d electrons originally present on chromium will distribute themselves in the available orbitals of lowest energy, as follows:
If we shine light of suitable energy on a molecule, we can cause an electron to move from its present orbital to an orbital of higher energy. The molecule acquires the energy required to do this by absorbing a photon of the light, so that not all of the photons which impinge on, say, a solution of the molecule, will emerge from it. If the photons absorbed have frequencies in the visible region of the electromagnetic spectrum (remember, E = hn =hc/l), the molecule will be colored. Moreover, the color that we see will be due to the photons that are not absorbed by the sample--they pass through it and arrive at our eyes. This color will be the complement of the color which is absorbed by the molecule. If a compound absorbs light of wavelength 550 nm (what is the corresponding frequency? energy?), which is green, it will appear to be reddish-blue, or purple. If a compound absorbs light of wavelength 600 nm (yellow), it will appear to us to be blue. The following color wheel should help you to see this clearly.
Notice that the complement of any color is directly opposite it on the wheel, and that any color can be obtained by mixing the two colors on either side of it. Thus a compound which absorbs red + green (= yellow) will appear blue to the eye. (A compound may absorb two colors when it can undergo two different electronic transitons in the visible region). As it happens, the splitting of the d orbitals (the Ligand Field Splitting, Do) in many transition metal complexes is such that visible light is required to cause the transition of an electron from the triply degenerate lower set to the doubly degenerate upper set, s*. (Such a transition is often called a "d-d" transition, since it involves promotion of an electron from one d orbital to another). Whenever this is the case, as we have seen, the complex is colored. The following figure illustrates the relationship between color and the wavelength range of visible light. Included is a spectrum of the Ti(H2O)6+3 ion, which is purple. As can be seen from the figure, this ion has an absorption band centered at about 550 nm. It therefore absorbs green, transmits blue and red, and looks purple (blue + red).

This is the explanation for the origin of color in transition metal complexes--split d orbitals which are partially filled. The importance of the latter criterion is nicely illustrated by complexes of ZnII, which has the electronic configuration [Ar]3d10. d orbital splitting occurs in ZnII just as it does in the CrIII example; however, since all d orbital spots are already occupied, no transitions within the d orbitals are possible--hence no color is absorbed, and the complexes are white.
ReferencesSpectrometer Cells. Cells are containers that are constructed to contain a precise pathlength of solution between two highly polished optical surfaces. Common cell path lengths for electronic absorption spectroscopy are 10 mm (1 cm), 50 mm (5 cm), and 100 mm (10 cm). Most commonly used are the 1 cm cells. Cells are supplied by the manufacturer as a matched set, with a set consisting usually of either 2 or 4 cells. The cells of a set must always be used together and never mixed and matched indiscriminately with other sets of cells. One cell of a set is intended to contain sample + solvent, the other to contain just solvent. It does not matter which cell is used for which.
Sample Preparation for EAS. There are two cases to consider
| Compound | Solvent | lmax(e), nm(M-1cm-1) |
|---|---|---|
| Co(salen) | CH2Cl2 | 490(3060) 410(14000) 350(12100) |