The Laboratory Notebook

General Chemistry students, please print this document with 1-inch-wide margins. Trim off the margins to make the document pages smaller than your laboratory notebook pages, then tape the document to the first few pages of your lab notebook.

The laboratory notebook is a record of your laboratory work. In most cases, it is the ONLY record of the work that you as an individual have done. If you are the only individual doing the work, then the notebook is the only record of the work that exists! It is an irreplaceable and extremely valuable document. As such, the laboratory notebook must be organized, complete, and useful. It will automatically meet these criteria if it is faithfully maintained according to agreed-upon format guidelines. The guidelines that we provide here are consistent with those used in academic, industrial, business, and goverment laboratory settings. Our expectation is that you will study and follow these guidelines conscientiously.

It is important for you to realize that laboratory record keeping is a learned skill, not a talent. A person acquires a skill only through continued, disciplined practice of an activity. By the time you graduate from WPI, you must have acquired professional level skills in laboratory record keeping. One of our responsibilities in the general chemistry program is to initiate the process by which you acquire these skills.

Guidelines for Obtaining and Maintaining a Lab Notebook

A Fictional but Possible Scenario

In a few short years, you will be a professional. Some of you will be professional engineers, others professional scientists (biologists, biochemists, or chemists). It will be assumed by prospective employers that as a professional, you are knowledgeable about all aspects of professionalism. One aspect, of course, is record-keeping. Suppose that you depart WPI as a professional biologist, and are hired by a genetic engineering firm, GenDesign, as a research scientist. You are assigned to an ongoing project, the goal of which is to develop a process for cloning dinosaurs from DNA extracted from insects trapped in ancient tree sap (amber). It's a hot field, so a number of competing firms are engaged in similar projects to achieve dinosaur cloning. There is big money and nobel-prize-level prestige at stake. On December 3, 2---, you make a breakthrough and successfully generate an apatosaurus embryo. As a WPI undergraduate, you have been well-trained in laboratory record-keeping procedures, so you have carefully maintained your lab notebook according to the general professional guidelines that you learned in school. Also, you have followed additional guidelines specified by your employer that require your notebook entries to be dated and witnessed by a colleague each day. Unbeknownst to you, on the very same day Freddie Dolt, a research scientist at a competing firm (DesignerGenes) accomplishes the same feat. S/he obtained a degree in biology from Acme University, which does not require that laboratory notebooks be maintained in undergraduate laboratory courses. Instead, Acme students fill out data sheet forms and turn them in to be graded. So Freddie doesn't know much about maintaining laboratory records. As it happens, on December 3 Freddie had left the notebook at home, so recorded all of his/her work for that day on a piece of brown paper towel. Freddie was a bit embarrassed about the paper towel, so did not ask a lab partner to date and witness it. Instead, Freddie spent the evening at home copying all the info from the paper towel into his/her notebook, cleverly writing it all under a December 4 heading. The next day, Freddie simply added the work s/he actually did under the same December 4 heading, and asked a colleague to date and witness the notebook.

A few months later, patent applications for the process from both GenDesign and DesignerGenes are received in the U.S. Patent Office, and a dispute is under way. Both companies claim to have discovered the process at about the same time. The only way to resolve the matter is to go to court. Attorneys for GenDesign ascertain the identity of the discovering scientist (you), and request you to testify in court as to the time and nature of the discovery. You are asked, of course, to bring your laboratory record. Similarly, DesignerGenes attorneys subpoena Freddie Dolt and her/his notebook. Because you have faithfully followed procedural guidelines in maintaining your records, you are able to weather the brutal cross examination by DesignerGenes attorneys, who are unable to discredit either the results or the date of your work. Freddie is not so fortunate. Under withering questioning from the lead attorney for GenDesign, Freddie is beaten to a pulp. Not only does his notebook record indicate that he made the discovery one day later than you did (even though he really made it on the same day!), but the attorney found several completely obscured data entries in the notebook. Even worse, the pages in Freddie's book were not prenumbered at the notebook factory, and the entries in some sections of the book were completely blurred because Freddie had used water-soluble ink. It is clear to the judge that the patent should be awarded to GenDesign. In short order, you receive a promotion to senior research scientist and a 25% raise. Over the next 17 years, GenDesign makes $8 billion from your discovery. 10 years later, you are awarded the Nobel Prize for your work. Poor Freddie is quietly let go, and spends the remainder of his career stumbling from low-paid job to lower-paid job. Having lost out completely in the dinosaur-cloning field, DesignerGenes makes large cuts in its workforce, suffers declining profits, and declares bankruptcy within 5 years.